Not so much a train of thought, more a replacement bus service of godless waffle, jokes and memes with a snifter of wine and craft-beer related stuff on the side..
Tuesday, January 31, 2023
Ideology vs. reality
Buyers Remorse
Monday, January 30, 2023
ZX80 is 43
Beam me up Scotty
It's just a number
Sunday, January 29, 2023
Dark Orange..
Friday, January 27, 2023
Breezy day trips..
Friday Smirk
J&M on the money as usual, if you figure out how to manipulate a social species by exploiting one of it's most ingrained attributes, i.e. the need for tribes and in-groups, then you're onto a winner!
Thursday, January 26, 2023
Reflections
As the French would say, plus ca change!
Curmudgeon Corner
Putty 2023
Tuesday, January 24, 2023
Then and now
Sunday, January 22, 2023
Curry town
Friday, January 20, 2023
Gender logic
Many people get very emotional, and as is very often the case, very illogical when it comes to the current gender debate. Clearly it's a complex and emotive issue, but, looking at particular cases in the light of simple syllogistic logic may often help us see the wood for the trees (this is a double entendre), for example,
- A Man says "I'm a Woman".
- This "identifies" him as a "Woman".
- Which means his "identity" is "Woman".
- The "identity" is "valid".
Let's unpack this syllogism,
- #1 is simply false, men are not women, by definition.
- #2 and #3 are the fallacy of reification.
- #4 confirms this.
Note: Reification (also known as concretism, hypostatization, or the fallacy of misplaced concreteness) is a fallacy of ambiguity, when an abstraction (abstract belief or hypothetical construct) is treated as if it were a concrete real event or physical entity.
Also note, "trans" doesn't appear anywhere in the process, it's irrelevant.
Downhill?
Friday Smirk
Thursday, January 19, 2023
All Change..
Flavours
Wednesday, January 18, 2023
The full set
Tuesday, January 17, 2023
Monday, January 16, 2023
Aerodynamics
Saturday, January 14, 2023
Friday Smirk
Thursday, January 12, 2023
January winds
Pell gone
I hear that George Pell, the infamous Roman Catholic cardinal in Australia who once debated Richard Dawkins (on the left in the picture) on Australian TV has died. He rose to prominence a few years ago because of sexual abuse allegations against him and via his contorted efforts to evade justice. Anyway, he's gone now which is a shame as we'll probably never know the truth and, as always, the victims will be denied proper closure.
Wednesday, January 11, 2023
Clooney anxiety
Monday, January 09, 2023
Sunday, January 08, 2023
Exercise resolutions
Saturday, January 07, 2023
Friday, January 06, 2023
Meh..
Thursday, January 05, 2023
Silly Beer (names)
Back to work
Wednesday, January 04, 2023
Strategy
Liquid cake
Tuesday, January 03, 2023
Tuesday Titter